--- "Kotsinadelis, Peter (Peter)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Gary Lim wrote: > > Hi Peter: > > I heard people were not too hot about this. Just curious how well > does > it live up to 35-350 and 100-400 at similar range and aperture? Any > chance you will be able to post some photos? > > Thanks, > > Gary > ----- Original Message ----- > > Hi Gary, > > I plan to test it against the 100-400 this weekend. I want to compare > it > and several other lenses. Will let you know and hopefully will post > some > photos. Seems like you and I are the only ones interested in lenses. > Everyone else talking algorithms. Photography sure has changed, once > all > we were concerned about was the image. :-) > > Peter K No Peter, don't feel alone, I'm still in "optical perfection" team. :-) Certainly, nowadays technology can't be avoided for obvious reasons, but besides all the math aspects my mind still looks for optical "perception". Frankly, even though engineering algorithms and technology become my main study and working objectives, I really enjoy "lens talk". Regards, Alex __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com * **** ******* *********************************************************** * For list instructions, including unsubscribe, see: * http://www.a1.nl/phomepag/markerink/eos_list.htm ***********************************************************
