On Mon, 21 Nov 2005 08:40:06 -0800, Henning Wulff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote/replied to:
>>I forgot, the EF-S 60mm f/2.8 Macro USM doesn't fit my 10D, but >>maybe it can be converted or maybe I'll buy a 20D. >> >>How does it compare for sharpness with the two 100mm macros? >> >>Mr. Bill >>* > >I've not used the older 100, but the 100 USM and the 60 are >excellent. The 60 is a lot better than the 50, as far as I can tell. >This was on a 20D. If the angle of view suits you and EFS specs are >OK, then the 60 would be my choice. It's a shame none of those macro lenses have IS. That's why I prefer my 100-400L IS with an extension tube for 'macro' work. As well, I have used the 50/1.4 with tube for very closeups. -- Jim Davis, Owner, Eastern Beaver Company: http://easternbeaver.com/ Motorcycle Relay Kits Powerlet, Posi-Lock, Parts, Info, Photos K100RSes on both sides of the planet! * **** ******* *********************************************************** * For list instructions, including unsubscribe, see: * http://www.a1.nl/phomepag/markerink/eos_list.htm ***********************************************************
