LOL, I'm going to post this on a Nikon group, you don't want to mess with their one perceived superiority, buddy!
Tom P. > -----Original Message----- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Chip Louie > Sent: Thursday, January 12, 2006 2:53 PM > To: [email protected] > Subject: RE: [inbox] RE: EOS 1D Mark II and Lens Test > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of > > Kotsinadelis, Peter (Peter) > > Sent: Wednesday, January 11, 2006 5:58 PM > > To: [email protected] > > Subject: [inbox] RE: EOS 1D Mark II and Lens Test > > > > Even when I'm only shooting architecture (much of my paid > work), I want the best glass. As much as people complain > about Canon's wideangle lenses shortcomings (ha, ha), I have > yet to find or even get a hint of any other lenses as wide or > wider, as sharp or sharper with less light fall off and > anywhere as good corner sharpness and low aberration levels > for a full frame sensor DSLR from any third party EOS mount > AF lenses. I suppose I could maybe adapt a couple of shorter > Leica lenses but then I would have to give up many of the > reasons I bought into the EOS system in the first place. The > issue of WA linear distortion IMO is moot as are most types > of aberrations found in Canon EF mount wideangle glass given > that I shoot digitally and these shortcomings are easily > quantified and corrected in post capture processing that I'm > doing anyway. > > Anyway that's my take on it. > > > Cheers/Chip > * **** ******* *********************************************************** * For list instructions, including unsubscribe, see: * http://www.a1.nl/phomepag/markerink/eos_list.htm ***********************************************************
