OK, thanks. That doesn't surprise me as the 28-135 w/a distortion is
pretty noticeable with straight lines near the edges.
I was more just asking for some "SQF" impressions. Don't trouble
yourself. I bet their not much different in practical terms.
Ken
At 03:17 PM 1/16/2006, you wrote:
Ken Durling wrote:
Since the 17-85 and the 28-135 are equivalent on a 1.6 DSLR and a 35mm
body - have you compared them to each other?
Ken
-----------------------------------------------
Yes, on an EOS 20D body. I will have to go back to look at the images.
Are you looking for anything in particular? There is slightly more
barrel distortion with the 28-135mm at wide angles. Other than that I am
not sure off the top.
Ken Durling
Composition and Music Services
Berkeley, CA
[510] 843-4419
*
****
*******
***********************************************************
* For list instructions, including unsubscribe, see:
* http://www.a1.nl/phomepag/markerink/eos_list.htm
***********************************************************
