Plus Konica made some very nice photo paper. A shame indeed.
Ken At 09:26 AM 1/19/2006, you wrote:
On 19 Jan 2006 at 16:31, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > Hi, > > I can remember the discusion if Canon IS Lenses where better than the > Body-Integral Anti-Shake System of Minolta. At least now we know wich > one was economical better ... > > http://konicaminolta.com/releases/2006/0119_03_01.html > > Appearantly Sony takes it further from now ... > > Leeuwtje > So now we finally don't have to wonder any more about the mysterious stock/production status of the Konica IR750 film, each and every year in the past....;(( --
Ken Durling Composition and Music Services Berkeley, CA [510] 843-4419 * **** ******* *********************************************************** * For list instructions, including unsubscribe, see: * http://www.a1.nl/phomepag/markerink/eos_list.htm ***********************************************************
