----- Original Message -----
From: "Tom Pfeiffer" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, April 03, 2006 3:41 AM
A friend has offered me a really good deal on a 16-35 (I presently have the
17-40) and I was hioping a couple of list members might have owned/used
both
and could comment on which they consider the best optically. I don't
really
have a need for the extra stop, but at the price, it's nearly a free
upgrade. If it's an upgrade.
Tom,
Sample variability is well documented for these lenses (16-35 perhaps more
than 17-40, but then it's been available for longer). If the deal is "really
good", why not buy it, test and keep the best? Seems like a no-brainer.
Please, forgive me, I am addicted to vicarious spending on kit :D
HTH
CraigZ
*
****
*******
***********************************************************
* For list instructions, including unsubscribe, see:
* http://www.a1.nl/phomepag/markerink/eos_list.htm
***********************************************************
