James B.Davis wrote: >Then you can always pick up the new Tamron 17-50mm F2.8 when it comes >available next month.
But there you have another large heavy expensive zoom. I'm looking for a small prime like the EF15. Something that tucks in a corner of my carry bag and doesn't weight much. I usually have my EF28-135 IS on camera, unless I'm bird shooting when it's the EF100-400L IS. In either case I'd like to have a small wide angle in the bag. ------------------------------------------- Quite the contrary Jim, it weighs only 15 ounces, is 3.2 inches long and 2.9 in diameter, and uses 67mm Filters. Compare that to the 28-135 which is 1.1 lbs. 3.8 inches in length but 3.1 in diameter with 72mm filters. The 17-50 is slightly larger than the EF15, but the EF15 is a fisheye and the Tamron is not. * **** ******* *********************************************************** * For list instructions, including unsubscribe, see: * http://www.a1.nl/phomepag/markerink/eos_list.htm ***********************************************************
