At 11:54 AM -0400 8/17/06, W S wrote:
I like some of the images from the 28-135 more than the newer 24-105.
Just that the 28-135 is already F5.0 @ 70mm. Still a great lens for
the price compared to 24-105 if lens speed is not an issue.
Wayne S
At 04:39 AM 8/17/2006, you wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I would take (and I often do) my 100-400 L lens only and be quite
happy.
But then I shoot SLIDES. Remember slides????
I'm with Jim on this one, the 28-135 IS is a great lens to have at all
times. Although the 50mm f/1.8 is also a nice lens to have in low-light.
>PS - Good to see Ann on the list once again - 8o)
I used to have the 28-135 (actually, 2 of them) and used it on film
and then digital. Now I have the 24-105 - a massive difference in
quality, except for vignetting and distortion, and those things are
fixable in processing.
--
* Henning J. Wulff
/|\ Wulff Photography & Design
/###\ mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
|[ ]| http://www.archiphoto.com
*
****
*******
***********************************************************
* For list instructions, including unsubscribe, see:
* http://www.a1.nl/phomepag/markerink/eos_list.htm
***********************************************************
