On Mon, Feb 26, 2007 at 02:05:59PM -0800, Jane Waters wrote: >Yes, please. I want to see what I'm in for in thinking of buying this.... if >it's more manageable >than the 400 f2.8 (since I have been known to use it with a 1.4 attached), I'd >be all over the >conversation of a 600 f4. How much does it weigh? Do you need an assistant to >help you schlep it >around (in trade for an occasional usage of said lens???) :-)
I want a 400mm f/2.8 still. I use my 100-400 a lot right at the end of the zoom range, so I could live with a prime. And the extra sharpness and speed of the 400 f/2.8 prime wouldn't hurt at all. As for weight. Well, memories of all those years in Catholic school holding stacks of encyclopedias out at arms length are coming back to me... -- void *(*(*schlake(void *))[])(void *); * **** ******* *********************************************************** * For list instructions, including unsubscribe, see: * http://www.a1.nl/phomepag/markerink/eos_list.htm ***********************************************************
