So are we going to continue to have this tit-for-tat or can we get back to EOS photography? This thread is well past tiring to the me and likely others who don't HAVE to be right or wrong or get in the last word.
Tom P. PS - sorry for the top-posting. > -----Original Message----- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Austin > Franklin > Sent: Sunday, June 24, 2007 8:12 PM > To: [email protected] > Subject: RE: EOS Pixels and RIDICULOUS questions about the EXACT SAME > IMAGE > > Hi Peter, > > > Sometimes I am not as precise in my wording with > > email as I guess I should be. > > In this case, I believe that to be true. > > > There are always people who like to > > justify the equipment they own. For many expensive equipment is a > > camouflage for lack of photographic talent, so they resort to > > other tactics to make themselves look important. Sometimes at the > > expense of others. > > Though that most certainly can be true, it would not be the case in this > case as it relates to my involvement in this thread. It had not a thing > to > do with looking important, I don't have any EOS digital cameras (yet, > though > I plan on getting one some day), and my photographic skills are probably > above average. It was simply that your statement didn't make technical > sense given your wording, and I simply asked for clarification. Simple as > that. Nothing more to it. > > Regards, > > Austin * **** ******* *********************************************************** * For list instructions, including unsubscribe, see: * http://www.a1.nl/phomepag/markerink/eos_list.htm ***********************************************************
