On Tue, 23 Oct 2007 19:24:40 +0200 [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Thorsten Leemhuis) wrote:
> > >> /topic EPEL SIG Meeting | > >> http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/EPEL/Tasks/NextTestingStableMove -- > >> nirik > > Not sure if anything happened there. Nirik, if you didn't prepare > anything and don't have time for it I volunteer to do the hard work > this Sunday. I have been swamped and haven't had a chance to do anything on this. Do we have all the dependency issues solved in testing now? Feel free to work on it, and let me know if I can help any... > >> /topic EPEL SIG Meeting | > >> http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/EPEL/Tasks/RhelMetaData -- stahnma > > We afaics still need use cases. Do people remember what people wanted > when this idea came up on the list? Let's analyze the three most > wanted datasets and put those online somewhere. The main thing I want is for new EPEL packages to have an easy way to say: "is this package or things it provides available already in a RHEL channel" ? > >> /topic EPEL SIG Meeting | > >> http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/EPEL/Tasks/Misc -- remove ntfs-3g > >> and fuse from EPEL4 > > Just remove it. Yeah, seems best. kevin
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ epel-devel-list mailing list [email protected] https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/epel-devel-list
