On 11/2/07, Stephen John Smoogen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On 11/2/07, Thorsten Leemhuis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > On 02.11.2007 16:18, Patrice Dumas wrote: > > > On Fri, Nov 02, 2007 at 03:15:07PM +0000, Mark McLoughlin wrote: > > >> What I'm suggesting for EPEL is more like a Fedora Extras ISO in the > > >> pre-merged world, then ... > > > I remember that somebody did that at one point, but I don't remember who > > > and how. > > > > Likely via the "install additional media" in firstboot, which afaik > > could be used for this. > > > > But well, lots of EPEL packages require parts of the core-os (EL in this > > case) -- those are not available easily at that point for if user if he > > didn't yet register his system on RHN. > > > > Which is why everything should be built against Fedora Enterprise(TM). > Fedora Enterprise a library of packages from an upstream provider put > into a format that other organizations can rebuild cleanly with their > own patches. Yes with Fedora Enterprise(TM) you can build your own > Oracle(TM) spin of EL without problems >
Sorry meant to be humourous.. however my coworkers reminded me that I seem to have left my sense of humour at home today. -- Stephen J Smoogen. -- CSIRT/Linux System Administrator How far that little candle throws his beams! So shines a good deed in a naughty world. = Shakespeare. "The Merchant of Venice" _______________________________________________ epel-devel-list mailing list [email protected] https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/epel-devel-list
