On Wed, Dec 05, 2007 at 07:34:11PM +0100, Thorsten Leemhuis wrote: > > Yes, completely agreed. But I'd like to avoid a deadlock where packages > do not enter the repo because people fear hypothetical problems. We'll > find solutions when problem comes up (just as RH sometimes has to find > special solutions).
I am not completly convinced, shouldn't the solution be found in fedora rather than in EPEL? > And nobody pays us for the job, so I suspect most > people won't yell at us when we say "okay, we had to update foo to > version bar which break ABI and API because backporting the security fix > was to hard" It is not the point, in my opinion. The point is if we can be almost sure that a package will bring in some problems we want to avoid, then we should avoid it. What is unclear to me is what we want to avoid. -- Pat _______________________________________________ epel-devel-list mailing list [email protected] https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/epel-devel-list
