On Dec 10, 2007 2:19 PM, Jesse Keating <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Mon, 10 Dec 2007 13:11:53 -0700 > Kevin Fenzi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Personally, my vote is to always add the updates in. > > It's easier to tell people that they must have an updated system in > > order to use EPEL packages. > > > > Any other thoughts? > > I agree with Kevin. The latest updates should be made available in the > buildroot. The /only/ time where this might not be done is at a point > release date, where a /lot/ of updates will be released. Depending on > how EPEL works with CentOS, there might be a delay at this point. > > -- > Jesse Keating > Fedora -- All my bits are free, are yours? > > _______________________________________________ > epel-devel-list mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/epel-devel-list > > That's probably reasonable and sane. It would be nice if we could put together some sort of schedule like when our builders get updates after a RHEL (or I guess CentOS actually) update. Is it 2 weeks? Is it whenever we get to it?
stahnma _______________________________________________ epel-devel-list mailing list [email protected] https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/epel-devel-list
