On 21.12.2007 16:38, Steven Pritchard wrote: > I've been trying again recently to get as many Perl module packages > built for EPEL as possible (so maybe we can finally have amavisd-new, > rt3, etc. available).
Many thx for your help. Also many thx to spot, he build some new perl packager in the past days as well! > In case anyone else is interested, here's how > many Perl module packages are available for various releases (counting > source rpms, not including the perl package itself): Some more stats from the pkgdb: 790 packages in the pkgdb starting with perl- a few of them are in EL5, so 734 remain Those with "# of packages >= 5" Fedora EPEL fasname 159 13 cweyl 158 83 spot 141 131 steve 70 18 rnorwood 48 0 corsepiu 25 14 pghmcfc 23 4 ixs 18 0 alexlan 15 1 iburrell 13 13 pertusus 13 12 sindrepb 11 11 orion 10 0 hardaker 9 9 ruben 5 4 mmcgrath 5 2 wtogami 5 0 abompard The above table is not to blame anyone. But it shows some things: * steve, you gets bonus points for having the most perl-packages in EPEL * pertusus gets bonus points for having all his packages in both Fedora and EPEL * corsepiu owns a lot of perl-packages, but doesn't participate in EPEL (he's listed on http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/EPEL/ContributorStatusNo ), thus his package will only land in EPEL if someone else takes care of them; * abompard is also listed on ContributorStatusNo (quote: "feel free to maintain my packages in EPEL") * cweyl and rnorwood participate in EPEL, but own a lot of perl-* packages which are not in EPEL. Cu knurd _______________________________________________ epel-devel-list mailing list [email protected] https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/epel-devel-list
