On Dec 29, 2007 6:16 AM, Michael Schwendt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Then be the volunteer to provide a package that includes the configuration > files for such a "most basic" clamav daemon. AIUI, the Fedora clamav > packager doesn't want to provide such defaults because he thinks it would > be wrong to do that. The Fedora Package Collection is not closed, however, > it is open to the community. >
I think the issue is that in the past, Enricho has come across as his way or someone maintains all of his packages. I am not sure if that was his intent, but the feeling came across. Adding in a package for basic configurations has been closed as a wontfix in the past. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=161953 > > > They do work, albeit differently than Dag's. > > > > Not the packages I installed today, they don't. Proof: install them, > > then run "service clamav-wrapper start" (or whatever is the name of that > > broken symlink). Anything happened at all? > > You are not supposed to run that. Read the documentation first. > Why does every time this package come up we end up with the same comments... there seem to have been several more in the old bugzilla.us one that I cant get to. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=157528 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=173221 It is a different packaging philosophy that Enricho has.. but it does seem to be different than most packages that Fedora ships. I am having a hard time coming up with a mainstream package that does it that way.. which I think is what causes the large amount of cognitive dissonance, and harsh opinions when they come up. -- Stephen J Smoogen. -- CSIRT/Linux System Administrator How far that little candle throws his beams! So shines a good deed in a naughty world. = Shakespeare. "The Merchant of Venice" _______________________________________________ epel-devel-list mailing list [email protected] https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/epel-devel-list
