On Thu, 24 Jan 2008 22:30:37 +0100 Ruben Kerkhof <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Yeah, replacing 3.2.1 by a single number and a disttag has my > preference. > > I'm a bit confused about the history of this package. I think it's > an old Fedora Extras package imported in RHEL at one time. > Here's the Changelog: > > %changelog > * Wed Jul 12 2006 Jesse Keating <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> - sh: line 0: > fg: no job control > - rebuild > > * Fri Feb 10 2006 Jesse Keating <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> - 1.1a-3.2 > - bump again for double-long bug on ppc(64) > > * Tue Feb 07 2006 Jesse Keating <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> - 1.1a-3.1 > - rebuilt for new gcc4.1 snapshot and glibc changes All the above were releng rebuilds. There is no good reason to keep the 3.21 > * Tue Jan 24 2006 Warren Togami <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> - 1.1a-3 > - rebuild (#177697) > > * Mon Jul 04 2005 Ralf Ertzinger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> - 1.1a-2 > - Removed unnecessary -r from rm -- Jesse Keating Fedora -- All my bits are free, are yours?
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ epel-devel-list mailing list [email protected] https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/epel-devel-list
