On 03.02.2008 18:52, Stephen John Smoogen wrote: > On Feb 3, 2008 7:37 AM, Thorsten Leemhuis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >>> whether to run against CentOS or the private RHEL repos >> I'd prefer the private RHEL repos if that's possible without to much >> trouble. CentOS would be fine as well, but there are small differences >> (no PPC (yet) for example; small delay with updates, new releases) > Well how many people have PPC :)?
No idea :) > Actually I was going to look at testing against both. Yeah, might be a good idea. > This allows us > to catch items where CentOS has something and RHEL doesn't.. Well, no offense, but that's afaics would be a bug in CentOS, as they aim to be compatible. > and if > something conflicts with the CentOS 'extras' repo so that problems can > be managed correctly. Good idea. But on the other hand: the repotag wars were now nearly a year ago and one of the bad guys (/me) leaves soon. Maybe we could somehow come over it and make peace with the CentOS guys and work together in a better way that works better for both sides? That was my and afaics everybody's else plan when we started EPEL, but didn't happen due some mis-communication and misunderstandings (that's the short story and I blame myself for a few of those issues that lead to the current situation) in the initial EPEL start phase. CU knurd _______________________________________________ epel-devel-list mailing list [email protected] https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/epel-devel-list
