On Wed, Apr 23, 2008 at 09:12:45PM +0300, Ville Skyttä wrote: > On Wednesday 23 April 2008, Arnaud Gomes-do-Vale wrote: > > > > At the moment, I am rebuilding supercollider and its extensions, which > > needs w3m-el, which in turn depends on lots of stuff. Here is the list > > of missing packages: > > Just by looking at the list, I guess that they're pretty much listed just > because the Fedora elisp packages (and maybe some yours) are built for XEmacs > in addition to GNU Emacs, not because they'd really need XEmacs; and some of > them in turn are XEmacs' dependencies. So unless there's sufficient interest > in having XEmacs in EPEL, I think it'd be perfectly acceptable to just > disable the XEmacs parts for now.
I have packaged xemacs in a 'private' repo in EL5 for some time now, and I have a user who use it to typeset tex documents. So far he had no issues. But I don't want to commit to maintain xemacs in EL-5, fearing that it could become time consuming. I would agree to be co-maintainer, though, if it is wanted. -- Pat _______________________________________________ epel-devel-list mailing list [email protected] https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/epel-devel-list
