On Sun, 29 Jun 2008 20:10:59 -0400 [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Ignacio Vazquez-Abrams) wrote:
> On Sun, 2008-06-29 at 15:08 -0700, Christopher Stone wrote: > > 2008/6/29 Till Maas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > > On Sun June 29 2008, Christopher Stone wrote: > > > > > >> This is the third time I have tried to get some kind of response > > >> on this. > > >> > > >> Is there any way to stop this spam??? > > > > > > There was a response in: > > > https://www.redhat.com/archives/epel-devel-list/2008-June/msg00164.html > > > > > > You need to get your package removed by the epel signers and > > > rebuild it once the dependencies are there. > > > > Ah, somehow I missed that reply. So, can we do this? Is there a > > special e-mail for epel signers? When will epel5.2 be a part of the > > build system? Why isnt the build system up to date? > > I believe they were originally holding out for CentOS 5.2. But it's > now out, so it's just a matter of priorities. I have filed a ticket for this to happen: https://fedorahosted.org/fedora-infrastructure/ticket/669 Hopefully it will be done pretty soon. kevin
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ epel-devel-list mailing list [email protected] https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/epel-devel-list
