On Wed, Jul 2, 2008 at 3:27 PM, Jeroen van Meeuwen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Michael A. Peters wrote: > >> There are a few exceptions. I do think RHEL is justified in moving Firefox >> to FF3. The reason is twofold - >> >> 1) Firefox has a huge codebase. It would take extreme amount of man power >> to continue to maintain FF 1.x without upstream. >> >> 2) The web evolves quickly, and a browser must keep in touch with modern >> web innovations, particularly in the area of javascript and CSS >> implementation. >> >> > A small addition here; RHEL does so by releasing a minor update to the > entire operating system (5.2) - so everyone knows to look for changes like > these. Is this something EPEL can do as well? > > EPEL 5.1/nethack-3.4.3 > > EPEL 5.2/nethack-4.0 (for the right reasons) > > Just a thought. I think that will imply to add another epel branch. such as move epel to EL-5.1 and then add EL-5.2 > > Kind regards, > > Jeroen van Meeuwen > -kanarip > > > _______________________________________________ > epel-devel-list mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/epel-devel-list > -- Xavier.t Lamien -- http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/XavierLamien GPG-Key ID: F3903DEB Fingerprint: 0F2A 7A17 0F1B 82EE FCBF 1F51 76B7 A28D F390 3DEB
_______________________________________________ epel-devel-list mailing list [email protected] https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/epel-devel-list
