On Sat, Sep 13, 2008 at 5:25 PM, Michael Stahnke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> offering the layered products in EPEL is like CentOS vs RHEL. If you > need support/subscription, you know what to do. Indeed it is. For instance, I am using Fedora Directory Server in a production RHEL environment right now, because I needed something that would work *right then*. I'm now in the process of procuring RHDS to replace it. Does RHDS offer any features that FDS doesn't? No. Is FDS supported? No. It's the support that I require, not being a directory server expert myself, so RHDS it is. I really do think that most customers grok that. Again, I could be wrong too. _______________________________________________ epel-devel-list mailing list [email protected] https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/epel-devel-list
