On Sun, Dec 07, 2008 at 08:02:25PM +0100, Patrice Dumas wrote: > On Sun, Dec 07, 2008 at 07:57:37AM -0800, Ray Van Dolson wrote: > > > > Sorry, I should have clarified better. The uuid module I'm packaging > > above is part of _python_ in Fedora (2.5 and newer?). > > > > So this module doesn't fall under those guidelines... :) > > I have done such a package for tetex-lineno which was included in > fedora package already. It is better, in my opinion, if you have > Obsoletes added in fedora packages and in later RHEL package that > obsolete your package. But it may be a lengthy process... >
Would Fedora/RHEL be willing to add an Obsoletes for an EPEL package? Were you able to get an Obsoletes included for your package? I was just planning to make my package require Python >= 2.3 and <= 2.5. I wonder how this would effect an eventual upgrade from EL5 to EL6 when it comes out. Thanks, Ray _______________________________________________ epel-devel-list mailing list [email protected] https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/epel-devel-list
