On Fri, 23 Jan 2009, Robert Scheck wrote:
> On Fri, 23 Jan 2009, Dennis Gilmore wrote:
> > pexepct ( congrats rsc, your package got in unmodified)
>
> That already happend for RHEL 5.2, that's nothing new for RHEL 5.3.
>
> > In accordance with out guideline of not replacing RHEL packages we need to
> > remove them. there are possibly others. Im going to get together a list of
> > packages that moved from EPEL to RHEL. I will mark them dead in cvs and
> > remove them from the repos.
>
> Again, can we please move an older version of pexpect (e.g. -0 rather -1 or
> so) for EPEL? You did not answer my question until now.
>
I'm not sure why you think you and pexpect are so special. We've done
this many times in the past and it works just fine.
-Mike
_______________________________________________
epel-devel-list mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/epel-devel-list
