On Mon, Feb 09, 2009 at 09:52:04AM -0800, Joshua Daniel Franklin wrote: > On Mon, Feb 9, 2009 at 9:43 AM, Ray Van Dolson wrote: > > On Mon, Feb 09, 2009 at 10:34:15AM -0700, Kevin Fenzi wrote: > >> - How can we get better communication between EPEL and RHEL? ie, the > >> recent packages they put in 5.3 without notifying or even providing a > >> higher evr. ;( > > > > I assume there is a RHEL6 target in bz for internal folks, but I don't > > have access to it. How should situations like this be handled? I > > filed it against RHEL 5.5 and just mentioned what I wanted done. We'll > > see what happens. :) > > On RHEL mailing lists it has been suggested that the only way to > close the loop for organizational support is a Technical Account Manager > (TAM). Perhaps if Red Hat wanted to show support for the EPEL effort > they could assign a TAM to at least read the mailing list. This would be > a person at Red Hat who has full access to inside information and so > could at least say "hey, I'd hold off on that since it will be in 5.5" or > maybe > answer direct questions off-list.
Hmm, I like that idea. Also, many of the companies we work for at $DAYJOB are RH customers. We could always start filing SR's for things that need done. :-) Ray _______________________________________________ epel-devel-list mailing list [email protected] https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/epel-devel-list
