On Fri, Jun 05, 2009 at 08:15:59AM -0500, Rex Dieter wrote: > I'd like to ask the Steering committee to consider enhancing existing > policy documents, namely, > http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/EPEL/GuidelinesAndPolicies > to explictly mention the case where packages migrate from epel -> rhel. > > Case in point here is a mild contention with what to do with > java-1.6.0-openjdk, where it recently moved into rhel, but is still > currently in epel repos. See also, > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=504189 > > I hope I don't put words into his mouth, but as I understand it, > Lubomir's contention is that the upgrade path issues should be > considered a blocker to removing this from epel, ie, > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499079 > > My current opinion is that these are orthogonal issues, but I'm curious > what others think. What say you?
Aside from nudging this for list discussion, I added this to an agenda page for next week's meeting: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Meeting:EPEL_agenda_20090619 - Karsten -- Karsten 'quaid' Wade, Community Gardener http://quaid.fedorapeople.org AD0E0C41
pgpecxHAc3HVY.pgp
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ epel-devel-list mailing list [email protected] https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/epel-devel-list
