On Thursday 09 July 2009 05:14:41 pm Ray Van Dolson wrote: > On Thu, Jul 09, 2009 at 05:06:08PM -0500, Adam Miller wrote: > > On Thu, Jul 9, 2009 at 5:02 PM, Manuel > > > > Wolfshant<[email protected]> wrote: > > > You do realize that a LARGE part of the EPEL consumers [including ISPs] > > > use Centos, do you ? > > > > Is that claim able to be verified with a realistic statistic? And if > > it is true they can set yum priorities. I don't see how its our > > responsibility to cater to those RHEL clones that are out of sync with > > RHEL. > > No offense, but it'd be a waste of time to gather metrics on CentOS > usage. Suffice to say it's very widely used. :) > > But I agree with what you're saying. I don't have a problem with > sqlite being in EPEL. The CentOS users can always exclude it when they > make use of the EPEL repo... Not an option, we said long ago that we would keep the version purposely lower and we must stick with that.
Dennis
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
_______________________________________________ epel-devel-list mailing list [email protected] https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/epel-devel-list
