On Wed, Oct 28, 2009 at 12:31 PM, Jesse Keating <[email protected]> wrote: <snip> > Would it really be a policy break if the old command paths were > retained? AFAIK the removal of the git-* commands from /usr/bin was the > only real 'break' between the versions, and if those are retained than > it should be an acceptable upgrade. <snip>
Yes, that was the only real 'break' and from what I understood that was the issue which would cause breakage and making it a violation of policy. But as it seems to be the case with later posts in the thread that issue has been resolved as per a slight modification to the .spec file for the EL branch and after that I do agree that it is an acceptable upgrade. -Adam -- http://maxamillion.googlepages.com --------------------------------------------------------- () ascii ribbon campaign - against html e-mail /\ www.asciiribbon.org - against proprietary attachments _______________________________________________ epel-devel-list mailing list [email protected] https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/epel-devel-list
