On Tue, Nov 10, 2009 at 4:51 PM, Manuel Wolfshant <[email protected]> wrote: > Farkas Levente wrote: >> >> hi, >> what's the proper way to distinguish epel from fedora in the spec file? >> i'd like to add >> ExcludeArch: ppc ppc64 >> on epel but not in case of fedora in a package (since there is no java >> on ppc on epel). but what's the current recommended way to do so? >> unfortunately %{?rhel} is not defined even in rhel-5 so what else can i
>> > > it is defined. See for instance > http://cvs.fedoraproject.org/viewvc/rpms/libprelude/devel/libprelude.spec?revision=1.49&view=markup > which separates the BRs for RHEL5 from the rest You need to install some extra rpm macros with the buildsys-macros pacakage http://buildsys.fedoraproject.org/buildgroups/rhel5/ Steve > > >> use to distinguish it from fedora? >> thanks in advance. >> >> ps. anyway it'd be useful to put into the epel packaging guidelines. >> >> > > > -- > Manuel Wolfshant linux registered user #131416 > IT manager NoBug Consulting SRL > A: Yes. > >Q: Are you sure? > >>A: Because it reverses the logical flow of conversation. > >>>Q: Why is top posting frowned upon? > _______________________________________________ > epel-devel-list mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/epel-devel-list > -- Steve Traylen _______________________________________________ epel-devel-list mailing list [email protected] https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/epel-devel-list
