On Tue, 2009-12-22 at 12:55 -0600, Michael Stahnke wrote: > > I completely agree. I thought we did keep 1 version back, but perhaps > I am wrong on that. > +1 on making this an official stance for keeping at minimum 1 previous > version. > > Is this difficult to change from a technical perspective?
Yes, you'd need significant changes in mash to support this, or you'd need to write a post-mash utility that merged the new tree and parts of the old tree together, potentially re-making repodata. It is not a simple/easy task. -- Jesse Keating Fedora -- Freedom² is a feature! identi.ca: http://identi.ca/jkeating
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
_______________________________________________ epel-devel-list mailing list epel-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/epel-devel-list
