On 01/13/2010 06:11 PM, Stephen John Smoogen wrote:
On Wed, Jan 13, 2010 at 6:41 AM, Matthew Miller <[email protected]> wrote:
On Tue, Jan 12, 2010 at 09:41:00AM -0800, Christopher wrote:
Possibly RH could use a one-higher Epoch in their channels. Everybody
wins.
That's the path of madness. Let's please not encourage it.
We also checked and rpm doesn't allow us to use an EPOCH of -1 (for
even more madness).
I think in the end, we are going to either rebuild what they have in
that channel OR not ship it. Joy.
or recommend using yum-priorities and use priority=1 for base / updates
/ RHN and >=2 for EPEL.
_______________________________________________
epel-devel-list mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/epel-devel-list
