On Thu, Jan 14, 2010 at 05:21:31PM -0700, Stephen John Smoogen wrote:
>
> ================
> found this by first looking for conflicts in packages and then doing a
> reverse walk with
> for i in $( cat file-of-conflicts ); do repoquery --disablerepo="*"
> --enablerepo=epel --qf='%{NAME}' --whatrequires $i; done
>
Wait a minute.... So the first list is conflicts with with
RHEL layered products. We're saying, these packages are in our new
definition of RHEL and thereforewe need to drop them. I'm with you so far.But why the second list? If the package is in RHEL, then we need to check the second list and see if they can build/work with the version in RHEL, right? Not outright drop? -Toshio
pgp3BO27ynJXA.pgp
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ epel-devel-list mailing list [email protected] https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/epel-devel-list
