Once upon a time, Stephen John Smoogen <[email protected]> said: > Well since it caught you.. I would say no. no is checking for this. We > need to put it on the get-er-done list.
I guess I did ask an obvious question there, didn't I? :-) I did a quick check, and it doesn't look like it is too bad at this point. At least one is a bug in a RHEL package (MRTG providing SNMP_Session's perl modules). Not including package conflicts (such as perl-Net-Telnet), I see: - GraphicsMagick-perl perl(Turtle) (RHEL: ImageMagick-perl) - atlas liblapack.so.3()(64bit) (RHEL: lapack) - perl-GraphViz perl(DB) (RHEL: perl) - perl-POE-Test-Loops perl(Switch) (RHEL: perl) - perl-Perlilog perl(UNIVERSAL) (RHEL: perl) - perl-SNMP_Session perl(BER) (RHEL: mrtg) perl(SNMP_Session) (RHEL: mrtg) perl(SNMP_util) (RHEL: mrtg) perl(SNMPv1_Session) (RHEL: mrtg) perl(SNMPv2c_Session) (RHEL: mrtg) - perl-XML-XPathEngine perl(XML::XPathEngine::NodeSet) (RHEL: perl-XML-Twig) - perl-Test-Mock-LWP perl(HTTP::Request) (RHEL: perl-libwww-perl) perl(HTTP::Response) (RHEL: perl-libwww-perl) perl(LWP::UserAgent) (RHEL: perl-libwww-perl) - perl-SOAP-Lite perl(LWP::Protocol) (RHEL: perl-libwww-perl) I have filed a bug about perl-SOAP-Lite (BZ 557485), and I filed a bug about RHEL's MRTG a couple of months ago (BZ 532556). Some of these don't show up as a problem because the EPEL package has a longer name (so yum chooses the RHEL package first), but I would guess that's not behavior to depend on. -- Chris Adams <[email protected]> Systems and Network Administrator - HiWAAY Internet Services I don't speak for anybody but myself - that's enough trouble. _______________________________________________ epel-devel-list mailing list [email protected] https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/epel-devel-list
