On Mon, 08 Feb 2010 19:45:29 +0100 Felix Schwarz <[email protected]> wrote:
> Am 08.02.2010 18:36, schrieb Toshio Kuratomi: > > The tar files there are giving me permission denied > > [x] fixed > > I think I forgot to mention one limitation of the upgrade hack: > bacula has several database backends - however these are not > pluggable (e.g. dlopen/so file). Therefore we have packages like > bacula-directory-sqlite and bacula-director-mysql. Currently you can > have both installed in parallel but use just one of them (that's > where the alternatives come into play). > > With the upgrade hack, the different db specific packages will > conflict with each other. If a user has such a configuration he can > not upgrade without removing one of the packages before. That sounds like something to note to epel-announce when the package is pushed out to stable. (ie, why it's happening and what to do to get it working again). The hack seems fine to me... but I also think it should just stay around in EPEL5 after it lands. You can get rid of it for RHEL6. kevin
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ epel-devel-list mailing list [email protected] https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/epel-devel-list
