On Mon, 8 Feb 2010 16:26:18 -0700 Stephen John Smoogen <[email protected]> wrote:
> > I think it has a nugget to work on so I am not against this.. > What goes into stable? I can see slipstream getting all the packages > because its easier to break things.. but I don't see much reason to > put stuff into stable. Well, we would need to be strict I think for what can go into the slipstream repo, and also it should be disabled by default in epel-release, so only those that enable it would see those packages. I would think maintainers would like to have their packages in testing/stable to reach the widest audience, and only use slipstream if there was no other choice. I agree it would be more work to have another repo, possibly more than we have people to work on at this point, but I think thats the best solution if we can pull it off. kevin
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ epel-devel-list mailing list [email protected] https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/epel-devel-list
