The important question would I suppose be what does RPM/Yum do with them...
I've a nasty feeling it uses lapack by default, but will use atlas for dep solving if it's already installed. Mark On 12/03/2010, Stephen John Smoogen <[email protected]> wrote: > On Fri, Mar 12, 2010 at 10:32 AM, Mark Chappell <[email protected]> > wrote: >> Stephen John Smoogen wrote: >>> Ok if my cave man hacking attempts were correct then this is the list >>> of things that in EPEL beats EL-5 stuff: >>> >>> Looking up all competing providers >>> Got all the potential problems, checking them >>> ================================================================== >>> lapack-devel-3.0-37.el5.x86_64 requires liblapack.so.3()(64bit) >>> epel wins with atlas >>> atlas - epel >>> lapack - el5 >> >> >> That liblapack.so.3 is tucked away in /usr/lib64/atlas/ and isn't on the >> library path by default IIRC. > > What I did was compare the list of provides with the list of requires. > One package requires liblapack and another says it provides it. My > compare routine may need some work to make it better :). > > > -- > Stephen J Smoogen. > > Ah, but a man's reach should exceed his grasp. Or what's a heaven for? > -- Robert Browning > > _______________________________________________ > epel-devel-list mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/epel-devel-list > _______________________________________________ epel-devel-list mailing list [email protected] https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/epel-devel-list
