On Wed, Jul 14, 2010 at 05:47:15PM +0300, Gilboa Davara wrote: > On Thu, 2010-07-08 at 09:05 +0100, Paul Howarth wrote: > > On 07/07/10 21:59, Matt Domsch wrote: > > > On Wed, Jul 07, 2010 at 02:47:26PM -0600, Stephen John Smoogen wrote: > > >> Wow thats a lot of packages. I need to get a build system like that at > > >> home :). For me personally it will be interesting to see why alpine > > >> fails to build. On the other hand it is nice that so much of F12 can > > >> be built on it. [Me I want to do this experiment with > > >> EPEL-4/EPEL-5/EPEL-6 and F-X :) but I am a completist.] > > > > > > here's the alpine log. Looks like the perl-version package got built, > > > and started getting pulled in, but conflicts. > > > > > > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=597982 > > > > Paul. > > I'm seeing 3 package failures (icewm, idesk and gmrun) due to the perl > error. > Any change of redoing the build once it is fixed?
Conceivable, yes, though my builds aren't being done in koji, and aren't tagged in CVS - it's just a "back of the envelope" view of what's possible. -- Matt Domsch Technology Strategist Dell | Office of the CTO _______________________________________________ epel-devel-list mailing list [email protected] https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/epel-devel-list
