On Fri, 30 Jul 2010 20:59:57 -0400 Adam Goode <[email protected]> wrote:
> On 07/29/2010 09:24 PM, Dennis Gilmore wrote: > > On Tuesday, July 27, 2010 06:19:56 pm Farkas Levente wrote: > >> hi, > >> is ppc still a primary platform for epel-6? > >> it seems from this build log that a noarch rpm can go to a ppc > >> builder: > >> http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/getfile?taskID=2355225&name=root.log > > > > ppc no, ppc64 yes. rhel 6 has switched the default userland on > > power arches to ppc64, there is compatability rpms for ppc however > > likely not enough for EPEL's needs. so epel-6 builds for i686, > > x86_64 and ppc64, we could potentially do s390x also if there is > > enough demand > > > > Is it possible to get shell access to a ppc64 machine with at least > 1GB of RAM? I would like to bootstrap the mlton compiler for ppc64 so > it can be built for el6. (Likewise I'd need access to an s390x > machine if EPEL starts supporting that.) I don't have a ppc64 box here, or I would offer access to it. ;( You might try David Woodhouse <[email protected]> He has a ppc64 box, but not sure what OS is running on it. kevin
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ epel-devel-list mailing list [email protected] https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/epel-devel-list
