On Tue, 2010-08-10 at 17:24 -0500, Michael Stahnke wrote: > On Tue, Aug 10, 2010 at 4:13 PM, Stephen John Smoogen <[email protected]> > wrote: > > On Tue, Aug 10, 2010 at 15:01, seth vidal <[email protected]> wrote: > >> Completely ridiculous but this is the 2nd time in a couple of weeks I've > >> seen this happen. > >> > >> Apparently new users are installing epel as a repo onto fedora... > >> > >> I assume they are doing by installing epel-release which is kinda > >> special. > >> > >> nevertheless - how painful/bad would it be if we added a 'Conflicts: > >> fedora-release' to the epel-release spec? > > > > Oh I was going to say > > > > Obsoletes: Fedora > > > > or > > > > ExcludeOS: Fedora > > > > but no that does sound like a good idea. > > > >> -sv > >> > >> > >> _______________________________________________ > >> epel-devel-list mailing list > >> [email protected] > >> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/epel-devel-list > >> > > > > > > > > -- > > Stephen J Smoogen. > > “The core skill of innovators is error recovery, not failure avoidance.” > > Randy Nelson, President of Pixar University. > > "We have a strategic plan. It's called doing things."" > > — Herb Kelleher, founder Southwest Airlines > > > > _______________________________________________ > > epel-devel-list mailing list > > [email protected] > > https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/epel-devel-list > > > Should be easy enough. I can make the edit and push a new one. >
I have an edit of one, too. did you already do it? -sv _______________________________________________ epel-devel-list mailing list [email protected] https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/epel-devel-list
