Once upon a time, Michael Stahnke <[email protected]> said: > If each shop is doing it themselves, that's a lot of wasted > productivity over the long haul. Ideally, this is done in EPEL which > will handle the default case (which is hopefully good enough for most > shops). After that shops may require adjustments to packages or > produce newer ones in year 3-7 of the RHEL lifecycle. I'd hope that > EPEL can at least be a decent starting point though.
I package up several things myself, mainly because I need it "now". I have plans to push some of those packages to Fedora and EPEL (or just EPEL, in the case of local rebuilds of Fedora packages), but I haven't had enough round tuits to get that done. I did separate my local RHEL repo into repos based on the source of the package, like "fedora-add" for things I've rebuilt from Fedora, "fedora-replace" for a few things where I needed a newer version than RHEL/EPEL, "hiwaay-add" for my packages, etc. Ideally that will make it easier for me to work with Fedora and EPEL to get my work into the repos. -- Chris Adams <[email protected]> Systems and Network Administrator - HiWAAY Internet Services I don't speak for anybody but myself - that's enough trouble. _______________________________________________ epel-devel-list mailing list [email protected] https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/epel-devel-list
