Paul Howarth wrote: > This then leads to the possibility of EL-6 users on architectures where > these packages *are* included getting the EPEL packages rather than the > RHEL packages. This could be avoided if we added a cost (> 1000) to the > EPEL repo in epel-release, such that yum would always pull packages from > RHEL rather than EPEL where the "same" package existed in both. > > Any reason why this shouldn't be done?
Sounds sensible here, might be worth speaking to the Livna/RPMFusion people and getting them to add something that puts them below EPEL? Mark _______________________________________________ epel-devel-list mailing list [email protected] https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/epel-devel-list
