On Tue, 24 Aug 2010 10:48:17 -0600 Stephen John Smoogen <[email protected]> wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 24, 2010 at 04:23, Paul Howarth <[email protected]> wrote: ...snip... > > Any reason why this shouldn't be done? > > I believe in the past we have asked the following: > > 1) Only build for the architectures that are excluded (eg build it > for ppc64 and not x86_64 or i386) > 2) Keep to the same version or make the release number smaller than > what is in EL-5 Yeah, I guess I was thinking we would only be building these on the arch that is missing them, but then thinking about that it means we have to touch the spec and can't just use the exact same one from RHEL. So, I guess I am not opposed to adding a cost in. Should it be 1000? Or does it matter? Does centos/rpmforge/dag/dries/iuscommunity use Cost? Can we make sure anything we add doesn't cause unneeded problems for them down the road? kevin
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ epel-devel-list mailing list [email protected] https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/epel-devel-list
