Hi Michael, > I ran some simple dep checkers against epel and epel-testing for epel5 > (on i386 only, and against centos 5). > > We have a number of issues. Some of them I have filed bugs on, but I > haven't made it everywhere. Please look over the list and see if you > can assist in fixing any of these issues. I'd like to talk about this > at the next EPEL meeting, if I can actually make it. > The list is including some EL4 packages, so there may be some false positives.
> package: perl-Text-vFile-asData-utils-0.05-3.el4.noarch from epel-testing > unresolved deps: > perl(DateTime::Span) > perl(DateTime::Format::ICal) > package: tcl-tcludp-1.0.8-1.el4.i386 from epel-testing > unresolved deps: > tcl = 0:8.4 > package: tcl-tclvfs-20080503-1.el4.i386 from epel-testing > unresolved deps: > tcl = 0:8.4 > package: tcl-tktreectrl-2.2.8-1.el4.1.i386 from epel-testing > unresolved deps: > tcl(abi) = 0:8.4 perl-Text-vFile-asData-utils is broken in EL5 anyway, I'll fix it. Just a note, I find all the repoclosures run posted in the last weeks to be very useful. I think having them run in an automated way would help raise the EPEL quality greatly. Regards, Xavier _______________________________________________ epel-devel-list mailing list [email protected] https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/epel-devel-list
