On Mon, Nov 15, 2010 at 17:29, Jesse Keating <[email protected]> wrote: > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA1 > > On 11/15/2010 04:22 PM, Chris Adams wrote: >> If not, I don't see any reason to wait, especially an arbitrary period >> of time. Release it now. >> >> Some things may not be there at release time, but again, unless EPEL is >> going to be held up for those packages, there's no point in waiting. > > I think part of the reason is that non-RHT customers have no binaries in > which to test their builds upon. Ballparking here, but I think not a > small amount of EPEL packagers are CentOS (or other) users and not RHEL > users.
The last time I checked it was 75% were CentOS users but that was around 5 came out. > That said, I think it would be quite fair to grant each EPEL packager > with a RHEL developer entitlement which could be used to test their > builds upon. > Good luck with that :). -- Stephen J Smoogen. "The core skill of innovators is error recovery, not failure avoidance." Randy Nelson, President of Pixar University. "Let us be kind, one to another, for most of us are fighting a hard battle." -- Ian MacLaren _______________________________________________ epel-devel-list mailing list [email protected] https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/epel-devel-list
