On 2011-03-10, Jan-Frode Myklebust <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> These problems should be the same for this package in EPEL5 (where 
> amavisd-new 
> is available).  IMHO this update shouldn't be pushed for EPEL4 and EPEL6 
> before the solution for EPEL5 packaging is clear. 
>

Ooops, single negative response in bodhi unpushed the update and
made the smiley-face cry.. Sorry. I didn't intend to block the 
update alone, but think this amavisd-breaking update should be 
discussed before implemented..


  -jf

_______________________________________________
epel-devel-list mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/epel-devel-list

Reply via email to