On Monday 22 of August 2011 18:21:14 Orion Poplawski wrote: > Epochs: ah, I forgot about this special thing ...
> # repoquery --whatprovides 'qt-devel >= 4.2' > qt-devel-1:4.6.2-17.el6.i686 > qt3-devel-0:3.3.8b-29.el6.x86_64 > qt-devel-1:4.6.2-17.el6.x86_64 > qt3-devel-0:3.3.8b-29.el6.i686 > # repoquery --provides qt3-devel | grep qt-devel > qt-devel = 1:3.3.8b-29.el6 > qt-devel = 1:3.3.8b-29.el6 > # repoquery --whatprovides 'qt-devel >= 1:4.2' > qt-devel-1:4.6.2-17.el6.i686 > qt-devel-1:4.6.2-17.el6.x86_64 > > Things do seem screwy though. qt-devel-0:3.3.8b provides > qt-devel 1:3.3.8b? well, to me, it seems much more screwy that older version gets preferred - even if qt-devel-0:3.3.8b provides qt-devel 1:3.3.8b, why 1:3.3.8 is chosen over 1:4.6.2? > Anyway, add the epoch to your BR. yes, that helped thanks K. -- Karel Volný QE BaseOs/Daemons Team Red Hat Czech, Brno tel. +420 532294274 (RH: +420 532294111 ext. 8262074) xmpp ka...@jabber.cz :: "Never attribute to malice what can :: easily be explained by stupidity."
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
_______________________________________________ epel-devel-list mailing list epel-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/epel-devel-list
