On Mon, 9 Jan 2012 15:40:43 -0700 "T.C. Hollingsworth" <[email protected]> wrote:
> Hi all! > > Node.js upstream recently switched from hardcoding LINUX_VERSION_CODE > to checking that __NR_accept4 is defined when checking that the > "accept4" syscall is available. (see patch here [1]) > > This breaks building for EL5 in mock on F16 (see log tail here [2]), > but not on a real CentOS 5 system. A quick grep of > $MOCK_ROOT/usr/include indicates that __NR_accept4 isn't defined, as > it should be, so I'm not sure what's going wrong here, or if it's a > problem in mock or upstream. Well, if something fails in mock, but works on a real system it sounds like missing BuildRequires. Perhaps kernel-headers? In any case, not sure what this has to do with EPEL... we don't ship Node.js. ;) kevin
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ epel-devel-list mailing list [email protected] https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/epel-devel-list
