Well.this is just a plugin? If so,Ithink so.
Best Regards, Christopher Meng------'Cicku' My personal blog is http://cicku.me,hope you can visit and say something about it. More Contact info see here:http://about.me/cicku On Sat, Jan 21, 2012 at 6:21 AM, Toshio Kuratomi <[email protected]> wrote: > On Fri, Jan 20, 2012 at 12:04:18PM -0700, Stephen John Smoogen wrote: >> On 20 January 2012 11:12, Russell Golden <[email protected]> >> wrote: >> > I maintain mozilla-https-everywhere, and upstream is going to release >> > version 2.0 soon. I hope. Anyway. If 2.0's only changes are new >> > supported sites, would it be acceptable to push it to EPEL, or should >> > I just use the repo I already have on repos.fedorapeople.org? If >> > indeed the only change is new rulesets, backporting would make the >> > resulting package 1.x in name only. >> >> I think this would be ok. >> > +1 > > _______________________________________________ > epel-devel-list mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/epel-devel-list > _______________________________________________ epel-devel-list mailing list [email protected] https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/epel-devel-list
