On Wed, 1 Feb 2012 12:59:24 -0700 Ken Dreyer <[email protected]> wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 1, 2012 at 11:31 AM, Niels de Vos > <[email protected]> wrote: > > What about ELS? I think that has an other 3 years... > > Right, this is why I brought it up. It would be useful to explicitly > announce, "We are not supporting EPEL-4, including security updates, > during the ELS cycle". Good call. I will add: EPEL will not be providing any updates or fixes for those using the ELS support from their upstream vendor. ? kevin
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ epel-devel-list mailing list [email protected] https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/epel-devel-list
