On Sun, 19 Feb 2012 01:21:25 +0100 Jiri Hladky <[email protected]> wrote:
> Hi, > > I do see that hwloc 1.4 in EPEL6 can cause a lot of trouble given the > fact that hwloc 1.1 is now available in RHEL6 (when I was creating > hwloc package it was not in RHEL6 and in fact I was the major advocate > to include it in RHEL6). I will revoke the request. > > I'm not sure about EPEL5 - hwloc 1.1 is now very old compared with > hwloc 1.4 Should I revoke the request as well? Since hwloc is not in RHEL5, I think you can update it to 1.4 as long as it's not a incompatible upgrade. Will people using 1.1 there see any problems? Will they have to manually do anything to use 1.4? If not, and it's compatible it's up to the maintainer. kevin
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ epel-devel-list mailing list [email protected] https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/epel-devel-list
